Осцилляции трех поколений нейтрино
Исследуется эволюция потока нейтрино, проходящего через конденсированное вещество и интенсивное магнитное поле. В качестве примера интенсивного магнитного поля рассматривается магнитное поле спаренных солнечных пятен, которые являются источниками солнечных вспышек. Предполагается, что нейтрино обладает дипольным магнитным и анапольным моментами, в то время как магнитное поле является скрученным, носит непотенциальный характер и его напряженность может быть ≥105 Гс. Проблема исследуется в рамках трех нейтринных поколений. Изучаются возможные резонансные переходы в нейтринном потоке.
1. Voloshin M. B., Vysotskii M. I., Okun’ L. B. Neutrino electrodynamics and possible consequences for solar neutrinos. Zhurnal eksperimental’noi I teoreticheskoi fiziki = Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 1986, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 446–452.
2. Giunti C., Studenikin A. Neutrino electromagnetic interactions: A window to new physics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2015, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 531–591.https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.87.531
3. Zel′dovich Ya. B. Parity nonconservation in the first order in the weak-interaction constant in electron scattering and other effects. Zhurnal eksperimental’noi I teoreticheskoi fiziki = Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 1958, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1184–1186.
4. Boyarkin O., Rein D. Neutrino mass and oscillation angle phenomena within the asymmetric left-right models. Reviews of Modern Physics D, 1996, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.53.361
5. Boyarkin O. M., Boyarkina I. O. Solar neutrinos as indicators of the Sun’s activity. International Journal of Modern Physics A, 2019, vol. 34, no. 33, pp. 1950227–1950246. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217751x19502270
6. Syrovatsky S. I. Pinch sheets and reconnection in astrophysics. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1981, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 163–227. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.19.090181.001115
7. Shibata K., Magara T. Solar Flares: Magnetohydrodynamic Processes. Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 2011, vol. 8, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2011-6
8. Galloway D. J., Weiss N. O. Convection and magnetic fields in stars. Astrophysical Journal Letters, 1981, vol. 243, pp. 945–953. https://doi.org/10.1086/158659
9. Fujikawa K., Shrock R. E. Magnetic Moment of a Massive Neutrino and Neutrino-Spin Rotation. Physical Review Letters, 1980. vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 963–966. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.45.963
10. Pati J. C., Salam A. Lepton number as the fourth “color”. Physical Review D, 1974, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.10.275
11. Mohapatra R. N., Pati J. C. Left-right gauge symmetry and an “isoconjugate” model of CP violation. Physical Review D, 1975, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 566–571. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.11.566
12. Senjanovic G., Mohapatra R. N. Exact left-right symmetry and spontaneous violation of parity. Physical Review D, 1975, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1502–1505. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.12.1502
13. Mohapatra R. N., Senjanovic’ G. Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation. Physical Review Letters, 1980, vol. 44, no. 14, pp. 912–915. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.44.912
14. Mohapatra R. N., Sidhu D. P. Implications for Gauge Theories if Search for Parity Nonconservation in Atomic Physics Fails. Physical Review Letters, 1977, vol. 38, no. 13, pp. 667–670. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.38.667
15. Boyarkin O. M. Advanced Particles Physics, Volume II. New York, CRC Press (Taylor and Francis Group), 2019. 555 p.
16. Tanabashi M. et al. (Particle Data Group). Review of Particle Physics. Physical Review D, 2018, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 030001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001
17. Boyarkin O., Bakanova T. Solar neutrino oscillations in extensions of the standard model. Physical Review D, 2000, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 075008–075024. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.62.075008
18. Barger V., Whisnant K., Pakvasa S., Phillips R. J. N. Matter effects on three-neutrino oscillations. Physical Review D, 1980, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2718–2726. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.22.2718
19. Tortola M. Constraining neutrino magnetic moment with solar neutrino data. International Workshop on Astroparticle and High Energy Physics, 2003, vol. 022, pp. 1–12.
20. Derbin A. I., Chernyi A. V., Popeko L. A., Muratova V. N., Shishkina G. A., Bakhlanov S. I. Experiment on antineutrino scattering by electrons at a reactor of the Rovno nuclear power plant. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters, 1993, vol. 57, pp. 768–772.
21. Li H. B., Li J., Wong H. T., Chang C. Y., Chen C. P., Fang J. M., Hu C. H., Kuo W. S., Lai W. P., Lee F. S., Lee S. C., Lin S. T., Luo C. S., Liu Y., Qiu J. F., Sheng H. Y., Singh V., Su R. F., Teng P. K., Tong W. S., Wang S. C., Xin B., Yeh T. R., Yue Q., Zhou Z. Y., Zhuang B. A. Limit on the Electron Neutrino Magnetic Moment from the Kuo-Sheng Reactor Neutrino Experiment. Physical Review Letters, 2003, vol. 90, no. 13, pp. 131802–131206. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.90.131802
22. Daraktchieva Z., Lamblin J., Link O., Amsler C., Avenier M., Broggini C., Busto J., Cerna C., Gervasio G., Jeanneret P., Jonkmans J., Koang D. H., Lebrun D., Ould-Saada F., Puglierin G., Stutz A., Tadsen A., Vuilleumier J.-L. Limits on the neutrino magnetic moment from the MUNU experiment. Physical Review Letters B, 2003, vol. 564, no. 3–4, pp. 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(03)00707-x
23. Billur A.A., Koksal M., Gutierrez-Rodriguez A., Hernandez-Ruiz M. A. Model-independent sensibility studies for the anomalous dipole moments of the ντ at the CLIC based e+e- and γe-colliders. Physical Review D, 2018, vol. 98, no. 9, pp. 095013–095035. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.98.095013
24. Deniz M., Lin S. T., Singh V., Li J., Wong H. T., Bilmis S., Chang C. Y., Chang H. M., Chang W. C., Chen C. P., Chou M. H., Dong K. J., Fang J. M., Hu C. H., Jon G. C., Kuo W. S., Lai W. P., Lee F. S., Lee S. C., Li H. B., Liao H. Y., Lin C. W., Lin F. K., Lin S. K., Liu Y., Qiu J. F., Serin M., Sheng H. Y., Singh L., Su R. F., Tong W. S., Wang J. J., Wang P. L., Wu S. C., Yang S. W., Yu C. X., Yue Q., Zeyrek M., Zhao D. X., Zhou Z. Y., Zhu Y. F., Zhuang B. A. Measurement of νeelectron scattering cross section with a CsI(Tl) scintillating crystal array at the Kuo-Sheng nuclear power reactor. Physical Review D, 2010, vol. 81, pp. 072001–072018. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.81.072001
25. Wolfenstein L. Neutrino oscillations in matter. Physical Review D, 1978, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 2369–2374. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.17.2369
26. Mikheev S. P., Smirnov A. Yu. Resonance Amplification of Oscillations in Matter and Spectroscopy of Solar Neutrinos. Yadernaya fizika = Sov. J. Nucl. Phys., 1985, vol. 42, pp. 913–917 (in Russian).
27. Boyarkin O. M., Boyarkina G. G. Influence of solar flares on behavior of solar neutrino flux. Astroparticle Physics, 2019, vol. 85, pp. 39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2016.09.006
28. Jenkins J. H., Fischbach E. Perturbation of Nuclear Decay Rates During the Solar Flare. Astroparticle Physics, 2009, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 407–411.
29. Mohsinally T., Fancher S., Czerny M., Fischbach E., Gruenwald J. T., Heim J., Jenkins J. H., Nistor J., O’Keefe D. Evidence for correlations between fluctuations in 54 Mn decay rates and solar storms. Astroparticle Physics, 2019, vol. 75, pp. 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2015.10.007
30. Sturrock P. A., Steinitz G., Fischbach E. Analysis of gamma radiation from a radon source. II: Indications of influences of both solar and cosmic neutrinos on beta decays. AstroparticlePhysics, 2018, vol. 100, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2018.02.003.